Compare Nissan Micra 1.0 and Kia Picanto 1.0 MPI
Sun, 22 Dec 2024

Compare Chevrolet Orlando 2.0 TD (96 kw) and Ford Grand C-Max 1.6

Technical specifications
Clear list
Chevrolet Orlando
Ford Grand C-Max
Totals Chevrolet Orlando 2.0 TD (96 kw) × Ford Grand C-Max 1.6 ×
MarkChevroletFord
ModelOrlando 2.0 TD (96 kw)Grand C-Max 1.6
Year20112010
Number of doors/seats5/75/(5-7)
Body typeMPVMPV
Unladen Weight--
Gross Weight Limit--
Top Speed, km/h180185
Acceleration 0-100 kph10.312.5
Minimum turning radius, m5.655.7
Cargo Volume, min/max, L89/466/1500470/1740
Dimensions specifications, mm Chevrolet Orlando 2.0 TD (96 kw) × Ford Grand C-Max 1.6 ×
Length46524520
Width18361828
Height16331684
Wheelbase27602788
Front/rear Track1584/15881559/1569
Ground clearance--
Engine specifications Chevrolet Orlando 2.0 TD (96 kw) × Ford Grand C-Max 1.6 ×
Typeturbo diesel Common Railpetrol Injection
Displacement, cm3 19981596
Compression ratio16.3-
Number and arrangement of cylinders4 cylinders, in-line4 cylinders, in-line
The diameter of the cylinder x stroke, mm86х8679х81.4
Number of valves1616
Power, hp/rpm130/3800125/6000
Max torque, Nm/RPM315/2000159/4000
Transmission specifications Chevrolet Orlando 2.0 TD (96 kw) × Ford Grand C-Max 1.6 ×
Gearbox6-speed manual5-speed manual
Drive TypeFront wheel driveFront wheel drive (dynamic stabilization ESP)
Suspension specifications Chevrolet Orlando 2.0 TD (96 kw) × Ford Grand C-Max 1.6 ×
Front
MacPherson strut

MacPherson strut
Rear
Dependent suspensions

multi-link suspensions
Tire Size215/60/16, 225/50/17
215/55/16
Disk5x114.3 ET41 d70.1
5x108 ET52 d63.3
Brakes specifications Chevrolet Orlando 2.0 TD (96 kw) × Ford Grand C-Max 1.6 ×
FrontVentilated discsVentilated discs
RearDiscsDiscs
Fuel consumption specifications, L/100 km Chevrolet Orlando 2.0 TD (96 kw) × Ford Grand C-Max 1.6 ×
City89
Highway55.5
Combined68
FuelDiesel95
Tank, L6460
Clear list
Chevrolet Orlando
Ford Grand C-Max